‘We’ can be an inclusive pronoun, acknowledging a broader community with shared concerns. However, some statements we’ve received for WeUsed.To make clear that ‘we’ can also be exclusive, sometimes inadvertently leaving out groups or elevating one ‘we’ at the expense of other ‘we’s. A specific use of ‘we’ may be innocent to one user but exclusive and even unjust to others. One statement posted to the site in particular, which commented on experiences of racism, has given us reason to reflect. While a ‘we’ defines a collective based on assumed shared experiences, the current debate about race inequality in the US and Europe has made us consider more deeply how WeUsed.To speaks to and hosts collectives that may display blind spots when it comes to inclusion. ‘We’ the initiators of the site find it important to acknowledge the potential friction in ‘we’ statements while retaining the option for users to choose their perspective. The ‘I’/’we’ choice is an invitation to actively become aware of and reflect on the communities we participate in, their scope, and their co-existence and/or overlap with other communities – or lack of the very same. You can read more on these reflections here: https://www.eer.info/activities/moderating-we-used-to